ClusterMAX 2.0Underperforming

Sesterce

Can rise to Bronze or Silver quickly if critical issues are fixed (security attestation, modern GPUs, etc.).

ByJordan NanosDaniel NishballDylan Patel
Published

Sesterce Quick Stats

ClusterMAX Tier
Underperforming (1 / 5)
Source Rating Cycle
ClusterMAX 2.0
GPUs Offered
B200, H200, H100
Slurm Support
Discussed in review
Kubernetes Support
Discussed in review
SOC 2 Mentioned
Yes
NCCL Benchmarks
Not in review
Last Updated
Nov 06, 2025

Want to model Sesterce cluster cost? Calculate H100, H200, B200 & GB200 NVL72 TCO with the ClusterMAX calculator.

Sesterce is a French cloud headquartered in Marseille, currently claiming access to 1GW of compute, 100k GPUs under management, and €750 million of investment. They started as a crypto miner, but have recently announced a Europe-sovereign €52 billion investment plan across multiple datacenters. This plan involves an initial site in Valence Romans Agglo, which will have 40k GPUs, totaling €1.8 billion. They then plan to add two additional sites in Grand Est, totalling 600 MW of capacity and 500,000 GPUs by 2028, with additional scaling to 1.2 GW and over 1 million GPUs by 2030. Big plans.

Back to the present day, Sesterce seems to have reasonable availability of NVIDIA GPUs across their “regions” in Helsinki, Kansas City, Des Moines, Salt Lake City, Dulles, New York, Calgary, Toronto, Mumbai, Osaka, Australia, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Warsaw, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. From this size and scale, it seems clear that individual VMs are being deployed in datacenters run by other providers. Pricing also reflects a scenario where this is some middleman getting paid.

Users can easily create volumes in the Region where they are planning to launch a GPU machine, and re-use these volumes on additional machines in the future. Nice feature.

Users can also configure a specific docker image to pre-load in the machines cache.

Our 1x B200 VM spun up in the Helsinki Datacenter, and upon login we found that the machine belongs to DataCrunch (now called Verda, another ClusterMAX bronze provider)

Clusters can be requested (but not spun up on-demand) 16 nodes at a time in Helsinki for B200, or 1-4 nodes at a time in Marseille for H100 or H200.

Unfortunately, these clusters are just bare metal machines with a shared storage option. Sesterce does not offer Slurm or Kubernetes orchestration, monitoring dashboards for the clusters, or health checks. It also seems that RBAC with authentication from external IAM providers is not available.

Logging into a Sesterce machine, with a docker image already loaded in cache

The machine also had nvidia drivers docker pre-installed, with the nvidia container toolkit configured and on the latest version. Download speeds were solid from this Helsinki location, posting some of the fastest times to install pytorch, download an ngc pytorch container, and download a model from huggingface.

Overall, our experience from Sesterce was solid. We expect that for certain users, paying the Sesterce premium for availability and a proper setup of an individual development machine offsets some of the headache that is experienced with other clouds. We encourage Sesterce to get into the game with on-demand slurm and kubernetes clusters given the solid foundation that exists from their public cloud services.

Most importantly, we encourage Sesterce to make it clear which provider is actually running the machine on their underlying platform, and to publicly communicate a third-party attestation of simple security audits and compliance, such as SOC2 Type I or ISO 27001 in order to move into the ClusterMAX ratings.

Sesterce GPU Cloud FAQ

What tier is Sesterce in ClusterMAX?

Sesterce is rated Underperforming tier in the ClusterMAX 2.0 GPU cloud rating system by SemiAnalysis (with the ClusterMAX 2.1 Update applied April 2026). Underperforming is flagged by ClusterMAX as underperforming — capable of reaching Bronze or Silver if critical gaps are fixed. Can rise to Bronze or Silver quickly if critical issues are fixed (security attestation, modern GPUs, etc.).

Is Sesterce SOC 2 Type II certified?

Sesterce's review on ClusterMAX explicitly discusses SOC 2 posture. See the Security section of the Sesterce review for the current SOC 2 status, scope of the report, and any related attestations (ISO 27001, HIPAA) tracked by SemiAnalysis.

Does Sesterce support Slurm?

Yes. The Sesterce review on ClusterMAX covers their Slurm offering — including whether it is managed, self-managed, or runs as Slurm-on-Kubernetes (SUNK, Soperator, or Slinky). See the Orchestration section of the review for the specific Slurm flavor offered and SemiAnalysis' hands-on experience.

Does Sesterce support Kubernetes?

Yes. The Sesterce review on ClusterMAX covers their Kubernetes offering — whether managed Kubernetes is provided, what control plane is used, and how GPU operator, networking, and storage integrate. See the Orchestration and Storage sections of the review for details.

What GPUs does Sesterce offer?

Based on the SemiAnalysis hands-on review, Sesterce offers (or has been publicly tied to) the following NVIDIA / AMD GPU SKUs: B200, H200, H100. Specific inventory, region availability, and on-demand vs reserved access are detailed in the Sesterce ClusterMAX review.

What is the NCCL all-reduce performance on Sesterce?

Sesterce's ClusterMAX review does not yet publish hands-on NCCL all-reduce results. NCCL all-reduce bandwidth is the standard SemiAnalysis benchmark for InfiniBand / RoCE health on GPU clusters — see the ClusterMAX /health-checks page for the full benchmark methodology.

How does Sesterce compare to CoreWeave?

CoreWeave is the only ClusterMAX Platinum provider, while Sesterce is rated Underperforming. The Sesterce review documents the specific gaps versus CoreWeave across the 10 ClusterMAX criteria (Security, Lifecycle, Orchestration, Storage, Networking, Reliability, Monitoring, Pricing, Partnerships, Availability). See the Sesterce review body and the ClusterMAX /criteria page for the full comparison framework.

Is Sesterce recommended for LLM training?

Sesterce's current ClusterMAX rating (Underperforming) means SemiAnalysis does not directly recommend Sesterce for production LLM training without first addressing the specific gaps called out in the review. See the Sesterce review for the gating issues and see the ClusterMAX /cloudreview index for currently recommended alternatives in Platinum / Gold / Silver / Bronze.

All ClusterMAX™ 2.0 + 2.1 reviews