ClusterMAX 2.0Underperforming

E2E Networks

Can rise to Bronze or Silver quickly if critical issues are fixed (security attestation, modern GPUs, etc.).

ByJordan NanosDaniel NishballDylan Patel
Published

E2E Networks Quick Stats

ClusterMAX Tier
Underperforming (1 / 5)
Source Rating Cycle
ClusterMAX 2.0
GPUs Offered
Not detailed in review
Slurm Support
Discussed in review
Kubernetes Support
Not flagged
SOC 2 Mentioned
Not flagged
NCCL Benchmarks
Not in review
Last Updated
Nov 06, 2025

Want to model E2E Networks cluster cost? Calculate H100, H200, B200 & GB200 NVL72 TCO with the ClusterMAX calculator.

E2E Networks is a publicly listed Indian cloud infrastructure provider. The company is undergoing an ambitious expansion fueled by significant fundraising and its integral partnership in the government’s IndiaAI Mission. The company operates datacenters in Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai, though their AI platform “TIR” only runs in Delhi. However, this is our final review in the article and our worst overall experience.

The testing process began with an aggressive KYC (Know Your Customer) procedure required before we could even log in. Our attempt to provision a training cluster, following their documentation, quickly ran into problems. The platform did offer an interesting selection of pre-configured software images, including NVIDIA NeMo, and options to create a shared file system for our slurm cluster. However, we ran into a complete lack of resource availability.

Creating a SLURM cluster

Unable to create a shared fs

The most serious issue occurred while we were stuck in this queue, waiting for our slurm cluster to be deployed. We watched as our credit balance was drained, and then went into the negatives. The entire time, we were unable to click delete on the cluster and remove our account from the queue.

Owing $7,061.05 for a cluster stuck in “creating” stage

Eventually, the E2E support team solved the issue by suspending our account completely. We view this business decision to charge customers for time while a cluster is spinning up but not usable as the most offensive business practice we have seen throughout all of our ClusterMAX testing.

E2E Networks GPU Cloud FAQ

What tier is E2E Networks in ClusterMAX?

E2E Networks is rated Underperforming tier in the ClusterMAX 2.0 GPU cloud rating system by SemiAnalysis (with the ClusterMAX 2.1 Update applied April 2026). Underperforming is flagged by ClusterMAX as underperforming — capable of reaching Bronze or Silver if critical gaps are fixed. Can rise to Bronze or Silver quickly if critical issues are fixed (security attestation, modern GPUs, etc.).

Is E2E Networks SOC 2 Type II certified?

E2E Networks's ClusterMAX review does not flag a SOC 2 Type II attestation as confirmed. SemiAnalysis treats SOC 2 Type II as a baseline expectation for any GPU cloud serving enterprise or regulated AI workloads — see the ClusterMAX criteria page for the full security baseline.

Does E2E Networks support Slurm?

Yes. The E2E Networks review on ClusterMAX covers their Slurm offering — including whether it is managed, self-managed, or runs as Slurm-on-Kubernetes (SUNK, Soperator, or Slinky). See the Orchestration section of the review for the specific Slurm flavor offered and SemiAnalysis' hands-on experience.

Does E2E Networks support Kubernetes?

E2E Networks's ClusterMAX review does not document a first-party managed Kubernetes service. See the ClusterMAX /k8s expectations page for the managed-Kubernetes bar SemiAnalysis tests against when evaluating GPU cloud providers.

What GPUs does E2E Networks offer?

The E2E Networks ClusterMAX review covers their current GPU inventory and on-demand availability. SemiAnalysis tracks H100, H200, B200, GB200 NVL72, GB300 NVL72, and MI300X / MI355X availability across all 85 providers in the ClusterMAX 2.0 + 2.1 cohort.

What is the NCCL all-reduce performance on E2E Networks?

E2E Networks's ClusterMAX review does not yet publish hands-on NCCL all-reduce results. NCCL all-reduce bandwidth is the standard SemiAnalysis benchmark for InfiniBand / RoCE health on GPU clusters — see the ClusterMAX /health-checks page for the full benchmark methodology.

How does E2E Networks compare to CoreWeave?

CoreWeave is the only ClusterMAX Platinum provider, while E2E Networks is rated Underperforming. The E2E Networks review documents the specific gaps versus CoreWeave across the 10 ClusterMAX criteria (Security, Lifecycle, Orchestration, Storage, Networking, Reliability, Monitoring, Pricing, Partnerships, Availability). See the E2E Networks review body and the ClusterMAX /criteria page for the full comparison framework.

Is E2E Networks recommended for LLM training?

E2E Networks's current ClusterMAX rating (Underperforming) means SemiAnalysis does not directly recommend E2E Networks for production LLM training without first addressing the specific gaps called out in the review. See the E2E Networks review for the gating issues and see the ClusterMAX /cloudreview index for currently recommended alternatives in Platinum / Gold / Silver / Bronze.

All ClusterMAX™ 2.0 + 2.1 reviews