SemiAnalysis
ClusterMAX 2.0 — Underperforming

Exabits

Can rise to Bronze or Silver quickly if critical issues are fixed (security attestation, modern GPUs, etc.).

ByJordan NanosDaniel NishballDylan Patel
Published

Exabits Quick Stats

ClusterMAX Tier
Underperforming (1 / 5)
Source Rating Cycle
ClusterMAX 2.0
GPUs Offered
Not detailed in review
Slurm Support
Discussed in review
Kubernetes Support
Discussed in review
SOC 2 Mentioned
Not flagged
NCCL Benchmarks
Not in review
Last Updated
Nov 06, 2025

Want to model Exabits cluster cost? Calculate H100, H200, B200 & GB200 NVL72 TCO with the ClusterMAX calculator.

Exabits operates as a bare-metal provider, primarily surfacing its capacity through marketplaces rather than a direct-access cloud. The provider is associated with a cryptocurrency project which seems to provide funding for GPUs through staking.

We attempted to provision Exabits instances via the PaleBlueDot.ai marketplace, where it is listed alongside other providers such as Digital Ocean, Massed, and Nebius. During our testing window, unfortunately no Exabits capacity was available to provision from this platform.

Lacking an accessible self-service platform or available marketplace instances, we were unable to evaluate Exabits against any core criteria, including orchestration (Slurm/Kubernetes), multi-node networking, security, or monitoring.

Exabits GPU Cloud FAQ

What tier is Exabits in ClusterMAX?

Exabits is rated Underperforming tier in the ClusterMAX 2.0 GPU cloud rating system by SemiAnalysis (with the ClusterMAX 2.1 Update applied April 2026). Underperforming is flagged by ClusterMAX as underperforming — capable of reaching Bronze or Silver if critical gaps are fixed. Can rise to Bronze or Silver quickly if critical issues are fixed (security attestation, modern GPUs, etc.).

Is Exabits SOC 2 Type II certified?

Exabits's ClusterMAX review does not flag a SOC 2 Type II attestation as confirmed. SemiAnalysis treats SOC 2 Type II as a baseline expectation for any GPU cloud serving enterprise or regulated AI workloads — see the ClusterMAX criteria page for the full security baseline.

Does Exabits support Slurm?

Yes. The Exabits review on ClusterMAX covers their Slurm offering — including whether it is managed, self-managed, or runs as Slurm-on-Kubernetes (SUNK, Soperator, or Slinky). See the Orchestration section of the review for the specific Slurm flavor offered and SemiAnalysis' hands-on experience.

Does Exabits support Kubernetes?

Yes. The Exabits review on ClusterMAX covers their Kubernetes offering — whether managed Kubernetes is provided, what control plane is used, and how GPU operator, networking, and storage integrate. See the Orchestration and Storage sections of the review for details.

What GPUs does Exabits offer?

The Exabits ClusterMAX review covers their current GPU inventory and on-demand availability. SemiAnalysis tracks H100, H200, B200, GB200 NVL72, GB300 NVL72, and MI300X / MI355X availability across all 85 providers in the ClusterMAX 2.0 + 2.1 cohort.

What is the NCCL all-reduce performance on Exabits?

Exabits's ClusterMAX review does not yet publish hands-on NCCL all-reduce results. NCCL all-reduce bandwidth is the standard SemiAnalysis benchmark for InfiniBand / RoCE health on GPU clusters — see the ClusterMAX /health-checks page for the full benchmark methodology.

How does Exabits compare to CoreWeave?

CoreWeave is the only ClusterMAX Platinum provider, while Exabits is rated Underperforming. The Exabits review documents the specific gaps versus CoreWeave across the 10 ClusterMAX criteria (Security, Lifecycle, Orchestration, Storage, Networking, Reliability, Monitoring, Pricing, Partnerships, Availability). See the Exabits review body and the ClusterMAX /criteria page for the full comparison framework.

Is Exabits recommended for LLM training?

Exabits's current ClusterMAX rating (Underperforming) means SemiAnalysis does not directly recommend Exabits for production LLM training without first addressing the specific gaps called out in the review. See the Exabits review for the gating issues and see the ClusterMAX /cloudreview index for currently recommended alternatives in Platinum / Gold / Silver / Bronze.

All ClusterMAX™ 2.0 + 2.1 reviews

Platinum
Gold
Silver
Bronze
Underperforming
Unavailable