ClusterMAX 2.0Bronze

GMI

Meets minimum criteria. Last category we directly recommend; often with inconsistent support or networking gaps.

ByJordan NanosDaniel NishballDylan Patel
Published

GMI Quick Stats

ClusterMAX Tier
Bronze (2 / 5)
Source Rating Cycle
ClusterMAX 2.0
GPUs Offered
H200, H100
Slurm Support
Discussed in review
Kubernetes Support
Discussed in review
SOC 2 Mentioned
Not flagged
NCCL Benchmarks
Not in review
Last Updated
Nov 06, 2025

Want to model GMI cluster cost? Calculate H100, H200, B200 & GB200 NVL72 TCO with the ClusterMAX calculator.

GMI is our top Bronze neocloud that is just not quite there yet. The company shows promise, with recent developments like achieving security compliance and implementing confidential computing capabilities for H100 and H200 nodes. However, in our testing the slurm cluster was frankly unusable.

We did not get access to a self-service console or monitoring dashboard of any kind, and it took over a month from our initial request, and multiple follow ups to finally login.

On the cluster, slurmctld was running directly on a compute node, and the environment was missing basic tools like docker the modules utility. More critically, the cluster was provisioned without a shared home directory across nodes despite having VAST with POSIX/NFS and S3 options in the environment. After negotiating to get a shared fs configured on the cluster, we found that the performance was terrible. Basic file-saving operations and carriage returns in the terminal would take multiple seconds to complete or respond.

One of our GMI nodes, with 1.9TB of shared storage, and 27.9TB of local storage, matching NVIDIA’s DGX specification perfectly

On the positive side, the underlying hardware appears to be configured correctly for high-performance workloads. A check for nvidia_peermem confirmed that GPUDirect RDMA is enabled, and the team confirmed that their interconnect network is built on InfiniBand with PKeys for network segmentation.

We also found no evidence of active or passive health checks, and no monitoring dashboards were provided to give visibility into cluster state or job performance.

In the future, when we can confirm that the Slurm offering is working well, development of monitoring dashboards is complete, active and passive health checks are in place, and a comprehensive Kubernetes offering is available, we expect GMI to be an obvious candidate to move into the silver tier.

GMI GPU Cloud FAQ

What tier is GMI in ClusterMAX?

GMI is rated Bronze tier in the ClusterMAX 2.0 GPU cloud rating system by SemiAnalysis (with the ClusterMAX 2.1 Update applied April 2026). Bronze is the lowest tier ClusterMAX directly recommends. Meets minimum criteria. Last category we directly recommend; often with inconsistent support or networking gaps.

Is GMI SOC 2 Type II certified?

GMI's ClusterMAX review does not flag a SOC 2 Type II attestation as confirmed. SemiAnalysis treats SOC 2 Type II as a baseline expectation for any GPU cloud serving enterprise or regulated AI workloads — see the ClusterMAX criteria page for the full security baseline.

Does GMI support Slurm?

Yes. The GMI review on ClusterMAX covers their Slurm offering — including whether it is managed, self-managed, or runs as Slurm-on-Kubernetes (SUNK, Soperator, or Slinky). See the Orchestration section of the review for the specific Slurm flavor offered and SemiAnalysis' hands-on experience.

Does GMI support Kubernetes?

Yes. The GMI review on ClusterMAX covers their Kubernetes offering — whether managed Kubernetes is provided, what control plane is used, and how GPU operator, networking, and storage integrate. See the Orchestration and Storage sections of the review for details.

What GPUs does GMI offer?

Based on the SemiAnalysis hands-on review, GMI offers (or has been publicly tied to) the following NVIDIA / AMD GPU SKUs: H200, H100. Specific inventory, region availability, and on-demand vs reserved access are detailed in the GMI ClusterMAX review.

What is the NCCL all-reduce performance on GMI?

GMI's ClusterMAX review does not yet publish hands-on NCCL all-reduce results. NCCL all-reduce bandwidth is the standard SemiAnalysis benchmark for InfiniBand / RoCE health on GPU clusters — see the ClusterMAX /health-checks page for the full benchmark methodology.

How does GMI compare to CoreWeave?

CoreWeave is the only ClusterMAX Platinum provider, while GMI is rated Bronze. The GMI review documents the specific gaps versus CoreWeave across the 10 ClusterMAX criteria (Security, Lifecycle, Orchestration, Storage, Networking, Reliability, Monitoring, Pricing, Partnerships, Availability). See the GMI review body and the ClusterMAX /criteria page for the full comparison framework.

Is GMI recommended for LLM training?

GMI is in a ClusterMAX tier that SemiAnalysis directly recommends for production GPU workloads (Platinum / Gold / Silver / Bronze). The GMI review details which workload profiles fit best — large-scale pretraining, fine-tuning, on-demand experimentation, or inference — based on hands-on cluster testing.

All ClusterMAX™ 2.0 + 2.1 reviews